Return |Home | Contact | NCGenWeb | Statewide
Randolph County, North Carolina
|
|
PLANTATION NAME: | LYTLE PLANTATION |
ASSOCIATED LINK(s): | |
ORIGINAL OWNER: | Thomas Lytle (ca 1740-1794) |
BUILT: | |
ASSOCIATED SURNAMES: | Lytle, Little, Glover, Stith, Grandison |
HISTORY: | Thomas Lytle
and his brother Henry were born in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, probably
in Upper Paxtang Township, which is modernly Dauphin County. It is unclear
which of them was older, but both appear to have been born a few years
either side of 1740. Their father’s name has never been satisfactorily
determined, nor have they been tied through historical records or DNA
evidence to other Lytles in the area. The name Lytle is nothing more than
the Scottish pronunciation of “Little”, and therefore not uncommon. Many of
the other Lytle immigrants arrived with the spelling of “Little” or “Litle”,
but the spelling for some of these families changed to match the
pronunciation. |
SLAVE POPULATION: |
==================================================== Notes for the seven original slaves: 1. FRANK LYTLE Of the seven slaves freed by Thomas Lytle, Frank (1773-1869) was by far the most prosperous. This was mainly due to his much larger inheritance and by being set free much earlier than the others. As a blacksmith and farmer, he did quite well, as is evidenced by his buying and selling of several tracts of land in Randolph County, involving several hundreds of acres over the years. The mortality schedule of the 1870 federal census tells us that Frank died in September of 1869, and his age was given as 95. (Longevity is still evidenced in his descendants today). At this time he was still in possession of the original 200 acres assigned to him by Thomas Lytle, with the exception of 65 acres which were sold to his daughter, Dorcas Swaney. 2. ESTHER LYTLE Esther Lytle (about 1775-about 1827) must have been very close in age to Frank, and it is even possible that she was older, but that Frank was freed first due to his being a man and able to make his own living independently. Esther’s age is estimated from the fact that by 1828 her oldest daughter Nancy had seven children and her next daughter had six children. Assuming a child every two years, starting at age 15 or 16, Nancy was probably born before 1800, perhaps about 1795. Esther would be 15 or 20 years older. Esther does not show up in any census record by name, but is no doubt one of Thomas’ seven slaves in the 1790 census. It is unknown who fathered her children, but she may not have begun to have children before Thomas died. Esther had seven daughters and five sons. The youngest four children were born free, as Esther was freed before their births. 3. JOSEPH LYTLE Joseph, or “Joe” Lytle, was born around 1780. There is no further mention of Joe after he was freed. 4. SAM LYTLE Sam Lytle was likely born around 1783. In the 1830 census, the numbers indicate he is living with a wife, four sons, and three daughters. He and his family have not been found after this census. 5. PARKER LYTLE Parker Lytle’s birth date is unknown. He is mentioned only once, in estate papers, and has not been found in any census or other record. 6. JOHN “Jack” LYTLE Jack Lytle was born around 1787. His wife was named Hannah. They and their family are found in Randolph County. Census records for Randolph County show the family there in 1840 and 1850. They had at least eight sons and three daughters. The daughters are not listed in the 1850 census. In 1860, the widow Hannah and some of the sons are found in the census for Ross County, Ohio. It is not known whether Jack died in North Carolina or Ohio. Two of his sons served in the Union Army during the Civil War, in the “Colored Troops”. 7. PINK LYTLE Pink Lytle was probably born around 1788. This is estimated from census records the number of children she had. Pink had six children born into slavery by 1812, and five children born free after being freed herself. She is found in the census records through 1840, and died before 1850. Like her sister Esther, it is unknown who fathered her children. ----------------------- Here is a typewritten summary of the families, except for Frank, whose descendants are in the hundreds (his wife and subsequent generations were considered white by the mid 1800’s). 2. ESTHER LYTLE, born about 1775; freed in 1816 Nancy, born about 1795; sold to Henry Humphreys
Children: Sally, born about 1796; sold to Henry Humphreys Children: Margaret "Peggy", born about 1797; sold to Henry Humphreys Children: Fanny, born about 1800; sold to William Hogan Children: Polly (Mary?), born about 1805; sold to William Hogan Children: Catharine "Kate", born about 1808; sold to Henry Humphreys Child:
George, born about 1810; sold to William Hogan Child: Tom LYTLE, born free, died about 1825 3. JOSEPH "Joe" LYTLE, born about 1780, no known children 7. PINK LYTLE, born about 1788
Child:
Rebecca "Beck", born about 1806; sold to William Hogan
Children: Jane Y. "Jenny" Lytle, born free, about 1819; several children, then married Alfred Chavis Children:
Joseph LYTLE, born about 1857, married Lucy: Dora C. LYTLE, born about 1864, married Charles W. GRANDISON: Louisa LYTLE, born about 1842, married George H. McCAIN in 1868:
Martitia LYTLE, born about 1842 Sally E. Lytle, born free about 1818
|
RESEARCH NOTES: | I have lots
of records of the Lytle Plantation of Randolph County. It was referred to by
that name at least once. Thomas Lytle had seven slaves. All were eventually
freed but not all of their children were. The seven were: Frank, Esther,
Joe, Sam, Jack, Parker and Pink. I have approximate birthdates for all of
them. Esther and Pink had children and grandchildren who were sold and/or
freed. I enclose two original images from an 1828 court case in Randolph
County listing these two women and their children. They are organized by
family groups, and I can clarify them in more detail if need be. Thomas Lytle bought the land around 1765 and died there in 1794. His widow and all the slaves were on the land until the estate was settled around 1828. The land would have been in Rowan County until Guilford was split off in 1771, and there until Randolph was split off in 1779. I have traced the descendants of a few branches, mostly Frank, to the present days. Frank’s descendants are today all considered white; the other branches are all African-American. Regards, Rik Vigeland Canby, Oregon |
MISCELLANEOUS: | File submitted by Rik Vigeland ; Will of Thomas Lytle 1794, WB 2,Pg. 2 |
North Carolina Plantations
A NCGenWeb Special Project
© 2018 to present by NCGenWeb Project Inc.